Thursday, July 26, 2007

Why Expelliarmus? (Deathly Hallows Spoilers)

Ever since we heard the prophecy at the end of Order of the Phoenix, one of the main things I've worried about is HOW Harry was going to defeat Voldemort without resorting to evil's methods. We've known, of course, that Dumbledore believed that the only way Harry could win was through the power of love, and that turned out to blessedly true. But I still wondered how it would happen. How would JKR show us a decisive victory over Voldemort (and make certain we knew he was dead) without showing Harry as a kind of murderer?

I think she succeeded brilliantly in showing us deep qualities of mercy in Harry. And one of the master-strokes is the way Harry uses the "Expelliarmus" spell at the very end, instead of the "Avada Kedavra."

Let's lay aside (for now, though I'd like to come back to it sometime) the troubling facts that at different points in the narrative, Harry casts the other two curses that have been classified as unforgiveables by the ministry. But he never casts an AK, the curse that killed his parents and that should have killed him twice.

One of the things I didn't expect, and which was another fascinating part of Deathly Hallows, was that by the time Harry met Voldemort for the final confrontation, he would be in a place of calmness and strength and power. I think I always imagined the final confrontation as something sort of desperate, with Harry somewhat cornered, yet protected and helped by love outside (as well as inside) himself. He was certainly helped all through DH, and would never have gotten there with the help of countless others. When the final confrontation boils down to just the two of them, however, it's clear Harry has the upper hand. Voldemort has lost all his horcruxes which we know has left him in a weakened state. He's lost Nagini and most of his other supporters, including Bellatrix. And as Harry unwinds the narrative, for him and for us, we begin to realize that Harry is pretty sure that he also has the upper hand in terms of wands. He's wielding what looks like a lesser wand, but because the greater wand recognizes Harry as its new master, his spell will be able to defeat Voldemort's.

I hadn't imagined the complexity that Rowling could bring to bear on the whole "Deathly Hallows" subplot, and especially on the wand exchanges. That was brilliant, with that seemingly insignificant little moment on the tower when Draco disarms Dumbledore in HBP being so key. (The only little throwaway moment that might have seemed even more brilliant was learning how Dumbledore used the golden snitch Harry almost swallowed in his very first Quidditch match six years before.)

So Harry is in a place of power: he's the master of the Elder Wand, he has Voldemort cornered, he has done everything he was supposed to do to ensure the other's vulnerability. And what is beautiful is that, standing in that place of power, Harry chooses not to wield it with utter forcefulness, not to vengesfully cast at Voldemort what Voldemort cast at him and his parents. He restrains his power. Instead of seeking to kill, he seeks to disarm...(a word with biblical connotations).

Lest we miss the point, JKR gave us that wonderful exchange in the early chapters where the death eaters figure out the true Harry's identity (in the midst of the decoy Harrys) because Harry uses "expelliarmus." It's an unusual move, one that doesn't seem to make a lot of logical sense, but one that's very Harry. He used it in graveyard in GoF, he taught it to the DA students in Phoenix. It's becoming his "signature move" -- and Rowling makes it utterly clear, in the way Harry explains why he chose to use it rather than send the imperiused Shan Stunpike plummeting to his death, that it's a move of mercy.

Harry shows mercy to Voldemort here, even in the act of ensuring his destruction. He throws the milder, disarming spell versus Voldemort's enraged killing curse (note we've got red versus green again!). Why is he ready to show mercy?

I think there are so many reasons, and it's late so I won't try to unpack them all. But here are just a few:

--He has seen the awful bit of Voldemort's lost soul (the piece that was blasted out of Harry?) which is beyond help in the waystation/waiting room/train station between the worlds after death. I think this is why he tries, albeit unsuccessfully, to remind Voldemort that only real remorse can possibly re-knit his unravelled soul.

--Some measure of empathy. As awful and evil as Voldemort is, he and Harry shared a lot in common. And as he was walking toward death, Harry remembered that Hogwarts was home to him, to Voldemort, and to Snape, "all the abandoned boys."

--Harry has been trained in righteousness. Albus Dumbledore, his primary mentor, helped train him for what Albus knew would probably very well be a certain death. Albus couldn't prevent that, and I think for a long time (before the "gleam of triumph" and the "flaw in the plan") he thought the best he could do for Harry was to train him for a holy death, a brave and courageous death that might win release for others. That's why he gave Harry so many chances to face evil and temptations and hardships, even as early on as Sorcerer's Stone. Perhaps even as early on as leaving him on the steps at the Dursleys.

Well, more on that perhaps later. For now, I'm just quietly celebrating that when it mattered most, Harry showed mercy. It was not a curse of Harry's that killed Voldemort, but the rebounding of Voldemort's own rage and hatred. Harry aimed to disarm.

4 comments:

Erin said...

That really was a master-stroke, wasn't it? And I loved that he did try to convince Voldemort to repent, though I doubt he had much expectation that would happen.

One of my favorite lines in the book is definitely "I won't blast people out of my way just because they're there. That's Voldemort's job." This attitude may put him at more risk, but I wouldn't want him to abandon it. It's such a deep and wonderful part of who he is.

I guess I'm not really bothered by his use of the Imperius curse, considering the circumstances and the fact that he didn't use it to do anything cruel. Crucio, however, was definitely troubling, and almost certainly not necessary. His strong allegiance to McGonagall is touching, though...

Beth said...

Another great line! I think we're starting a collection!

Yes, I know what you mean. I couldn't see much of a way around imperio at Gringotts. And at least it seemed to be something that would only last a short while. To be honest, I have almost as hard a time with the notion of obliviate as I do imperio, and yet the ministry uses that one all the time and chose not to classify it as unforgiveable.

But crucio felt completely uneccesary. I also didn't understand why he was suddenly able to cast it. Bellatrix had told him that "righteous anger" wouldn't make a curse work. If that's true, then we're led to believe that his anger over Sirius' death was too righteous an anger for him to make the curse work. Which would seem to indicate that what he feels when he sees McGonagall spat upon would not be righteous anger, and yet I'd wager that that's the kind of anger that would rise in me over something like that. So...hmmm...lots to ponder.

I wonder if adrenaline has anything to do with it? I also wondered at the fact that it didn't seem to cause tremendous pain even though it was crucio -- I need to look at the scene again. The whole thing felt kind of "throwaway." I could do away with that moment and change the Molly Weasley moment at the end and add the Snape in the headmaster's portrait moment and I think I'd almost be perfectly content with the book.

Not picky at all, am I? ;-)

Erin said...

Ah, yes, Molly... It was pretty jarring to see her in the throes of such fury, though of course she's always had a ferocious streak, as we've seen with the Howlers! Not sure just what to think of that. It does seem like Bellatrix needed to at least be out of commission for the big showdown between Voldemort and Harry, and it certainly makes sense for her to go into overdrive protecting her daughter, and to be able to produce the killing curse, considering what she has suffered. But it is kind of a shame that our last impression of the warm, affectionate, maternal Molly is of her as a murderer...

Beth said...

Yes. Definitely my least favorite moment. More on that one sometime too!